appreciated. When using the Microsoft Management Studio development tool to run the application, the error does not occur. For some unknown reason, when the Thread 2 is made from the java application it demands additional locks. If you would like to browse in a different language, please choose a language using the dropdown. Thread 2: Runs, select * from flights with (rowlock, updlock) where id '2222' and datop '. I have tried both Microsoft jdbc Driver.0 and the jTDS driver version.2.5 with the same result. I have a table where the primary key consists of two columns, id (varchar) and datop (date). We have selected English as your language preference.
Vårdcentralen lunden i malmö
Körsnär andersson stockholm
The problem is that if this transaction is run concurrently in two different threads the second transaction is not able to retrieve the row due to a lock which is held in the first transaction. Thread 1: Starts transaction. Lundin co-hosted the, eurovision Song Contest 2000 along with. Here is the scenario when Thread 2 is made via jdbc:. This is the expected behaviour. When I look at the locks held in the SQL Server database at the time given by mark 5 above I see that Thread 1 has a KEY lock (lock on index) on a resource with an id "X" and Thread 2 has a KEY. My transaction first selects a row from the column, and depending on what it finds it updates the row and potentially multiple other rows in other tables. Thread 2: Starts transaction. Jens Sørensen iveco, Nationalism in Denmark exposed, Afkriminaliser Cannabis, Anima, Stop ttip-Bevægelsen, CC Pro Shop, Kolding, Mærk Kødet - Det Gør Kloden, FME Modules, Nok NU - Cannabis er lovlig medicin, 8'eren fra Campus Kolding, Aktieportefø, Rise of Veganism DK, P P's vej til svendebrev. This effectivly singlethreads all updates made by this transaction, causing poor performance. Allt för Sverige which takes Americans to Sweden to learn more about their Swedish ancestry. Kattis Ahlström and, 200310, was every summer host for the successful song show.